Posts
After receiving the December 2 Award, which sided unanimously with Labor, the carriers filed a request for interpretation. In the December 8 Award, a panel of three arbitrators ruled that the FMLA policies of the four largest Class I railroads (BNSF,
In the January 2 Award, the arbitrators unanimously rejected the carriers’ suggestions that:
1. Unscheduled leave should be treated differently from scheduled leave for purposes of their ability to force employees to use their paid leave as FMLA leave; and
2. The BLET personal leave agreement should be treated differently than the other national personal leave agreements for FMLA substitution purposes.
“I am pleased the arbitrators unanimously agreed with our position,” BLET National President Ed Rodzwicz said. “I ask for patience from our members as this lengthy legal process continues to unfold.”
Approximately two years ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that the law did not permit the carriers to override collective bargaining agreement provisions that gave workers control over scheduling paid leave. The legal process has been ongoing ever since.
Regarding the first interpretation question, the Board: “unanimously agree[d] that, just as no substitution of such days for FMLA leave may occur after such days are set, neither can it occur before those days are set. We see no legitimate distinction between the two. The carriers are therefore not permitted to require substitution of paid personal leave and/or single vacation days for FMLA leave before those days are set.”
Regarding the second, the arbitrators wrote that they: “similarly see no distinction that would vary the impact of our Award, which we intended to apply to [the BLET] agreement’s subject matter just as it does to all the others. Our Award therefore bars substitution of paid personal leave under the BLET national personal leave agreement.”
The unions are now preparing for the remedy phase of the arbitration. It is expected that a decision on that issue will be issued sometime this spring. Attorneys Mike Wolly and Margo Pave of the firm Zwerdling, Paul, Kahn & Wolly, P.C., are handling the case for BLET and several other Rail Labor unions.
More information regarding subsequent hearings will be made available on the BLET website.
Friday, January 09, 2009
bentley@ble.org
http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4754
