Tuesday, December 09, 2008

BLET, labor win big in FMLA arbitration

CLEVELAND, December 8 — In a decision received this afternoon, a panel of three arbitrators has ruled that the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) policies of the four largest Class I railroads (BNSF, CSXT, NS and UP) violate the industry’s national vacation and personal leave agreements. Among the victors are BLET members working for these railroads.

The BLET, along with ten other unions, had challenged carrier policies that required workers to use paid vacation and personal leave when taking FMLA leave in certain circumstances. Nearly two years ago the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that the law did not permit the carriers to override collective bargaining agreement provisions that gave workers control over scheduling paid leave. When the Supreme Court declined to hear the industry’s appeal, the stage was set for the arbitration of the matter.

The arbitration panel held that “the parties’ contracts at issue here do, as the District Court posited … ‘grant employees rights in addition to the accrual of vacation and/or personal leave, such as the right to determine when to use their accrued vacation and/or personal leave.’ … In all cases, employers may not unilaterally change scheduled vacations without good cause and appropriate notice. … [O]nce those days are set, no unilateral employer changes may occur without meeting specified contractual standards. These are not insignificant contractual benefits.”

The panel also found that “clear contract language and similar consistent arbitral precedent protect use of personal leave days and individual vacation days from arbitrary or unreasonable unilateral employer action unrelated to operational needs or other contractual standards.” The Award states “The carriers’ policies requiring employees to substitute paid vacation and/or paid personal leave for unpaid FMLA leave do violate the requirements of the national vacation and/or national personal leave agreements.”

According to the Arbitration Agreement, the Award becomes effective on December 16, 2008. On that date, the Agreement provides that “the carriers will immediately discontinue the invalidated provisions of [their] policies.” The arbitrators then will consider “the appropriate remedy for employees who were required to use paid leave for FMLA leave in violation of the national vacation and/or national personal leave agreements.” Assuming no agreed-upon extensions, initial submissions on that question will be due January 15, 2009, and reply submissions on January 30. A hearing then would be held by February 13, with a decision to be issued by April 14.

BLET National President Ed Rodzwicz congratulated those who made this victory possible, and thanked the BLET membership for their patience. “I want to congratulate, first and foremost, Mike Wolly, Margo Pave and the legal team who put on a great case, and our General Chairmen who persisted in keeping this struggle alive on the property and providing us with the data we needed to win. I also want to express my most sincere thanks to the Brothers and Sisters on BNSF, CSXT, NS, and UP for hanging in there throughout the many years that have passed while we fought to vindicate their vacation and personal leave rights.”

The Award is available for download as a PDF from the BLET website at:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/JSCaseNo3750.pdf

Monday, November 17, 2008

BLET, UTU jointly petition FRA for review of EO 26

CLEVELAND, November 17 — The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) and the United Transportation Union (UTU) filed a joint Petition for Review of Emergency Order 26 on November 14, requesting that the Federal Railroad Administration make specific exceptions to the Order in the name of safety.

The Emergency Order was issued on October 7, 2008, and significantly limits employee use of personal electronic devices in locomotive cabs. The ban applies to any electronic device that was not provided to the railroad operating employee by the employing railroad for business purposes.

“It is not our intention to unnecessarily complicate a fairly bright-line rule regarding the use of electronic and electrical devices,” BLET President Ed Rodzwicz and UTU President Mike Futhey said in their Petition for Review. “However, we do believe FRA should seriously consider those atypical situations in which EO 26 as currently written could inadvertently result in a diminution of safety, as compared to operating conditions and practices in effect prior to its promulgation.”

The Emergency Order came about because of the tragic accident in Chatsworth, Calif., which claimed the lives of 25 people on September 12 when a Metrolink passenger train collided with a Union Pacific train. Initial NTSB reports indicated the Metrolink engineer may have been distracted by use of a personal cellular phone while on duty.

“The safety of our members and the general public is the top priority of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, and these exceptions to Emergency Order 26 will make it much more effective,” BLET President Rodzwicz said. “The best way for our members to comply with the Emergency Order is to turn off their personal electronic devices, store them in their grips, and do not use them until you have been relieved from duty.”

BLET and UTU are seeking an exception to the Order banning the use of personal electronic devices while deadheading. While the unions agree that the Emergency Order seeks to improve safety, they argue that, “since deadheading crews have fulfilled their safety-related responsibilities — and in many cases are not on duty — they should not be restricted to ‘business purpose use’ only.”

To that end, the unions ask the FRA to rewrite a portion of the EO so that it reads: “A railroad operating employee who is deadheading may use a cell phone while within the body of a passenger train or railroad business car, or while inside the cab of a locomotive that is not the lead locomotive of the train on which the employee is deadheading.”

The use of cameras is also called into question. BLET and UTU argue that the EO appears to forbid photographic documentation by a train employee of safety hazards or violations of rail safety laws, regulations, orders or standards, which would actually diminish railroad safety.

On that issue, BLET and UTU ask for an exemption, which would read as follows:

“An electronic still or video camera may be used to document a safety hazard or a violation of a rail safety law, regulation, order or standard; provided, that (1) the use of a camera in the cab of a moving train may only be by a crew member other than the locomotive engineer, and (2) the use of a camera by a train employee on the ground is permissible only when (a) the employee is not fouling a track, (b) no switching operation is underway, (c) no other safety duties are presently required, and (d) all members of the crew have been briefed that operations are suspended. The use of the photographic function of a cell phone is permitted under these same conditions.”

Thirdly, the unions question a section of the EO that prohibits the use of electronic devices such (as calculators) to make computations. The BLET and UTU point out that a number of safety-critical computational functions are required in numerous circumstances if on-board systems fail or are not provided. These include managing correct horsepower per ton, calculating tons per operative brake, dynamic brake and tractive effort compliance, and correcting train length for speed restrictions and clearing track authorities.

A new section regarding exceptions to this portion of the EO should be added, and should be worded as follows:

“When mathematical calculations are required for safe train movement (e.g., managing correct horsepower per ton, calculating tons per operative brake, dynamic brake and tractive effort compliance, and correcting train length), it is permissible to perform such calculations by using an electronic calculator, or by using the calculator function of a cell phone or electronic timepiece.”

Finally, the unions petition the FRA to allow the use of Global Positioning Satellite tracking devices in order to gauge the accuracy of locomotive speed indicators, particularly when the designated measured mile lies within a temporary speed restriction of less than 30 miles per hour.

One effect of EO 26 is to preclude the use of a GPS device to calculate the speed of a train that is not equipped with a speed indicator because the train will not exceed 20 mph. Another is that the accuracy of a speed indicator determined within a slow order of 30 mph or less cannot be correlated with its accuracy at speed above 30 mph. Maintaining proper train speed is both safety-critical and demanded of a locomotive engineers.

The BLET and UTU petition the FRA to consider an exception to the EO for GPS devices, requesting that GPS tracking devices be allowed to verify the accuracy of the speed indicator in a controlling locomotive.

The joint Petition for Review was submitted to FRA today.

“BLET and UTU members will be kept apprised of the situation, and will be advised once FRA responds to our concerns,” Presidents Rodzwicz and Futhey said.

Monday, November 17, 2008
bentley@ble.org

 

Friday, November 14, 2008

Court of Appeals continues stays on direct observation rule

CLEVELAND, November 13 — In an order issued yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has extended its stay of the implementation of a Department of Transportation regulation that would require direct observation of urine specimen donation in all return-to-duty and follow-up drug tests, which was to take effect on November 1.

The stay will remain in effect until the Court considers and rules on challenges to the constitutionality and legality of mandatory direct observation and an associated “strip search” requirement that were filed by nine unions — including the BLET and International Brotherhood of Teamsters — and the BNSF Railway.

The Court also issued the following briefing schedule:

·  The Joint Brief of Petitioners is due on December 12, 2008.

·  The Brief of Respondent DOT is due on January 12, 2009.

·  The Joint Reply Brief of Petitioners is due on January 26, 2009.

In addition, the Court directed that the case be placed on the argument calendar on the first available date following completion of briefing.

Thursday, November 13, 2008
bentley@ble.org

http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4730

Friday, November 07, 2008

Railroad Employees Flexible Benefits Program

Brothers,

I have been asked a question regarding the eligibility of engineers covered under the BLET National Agreement for Health and Welfare who are reduced to train service having an entitlement to continue enrollment in the BLET Flexible Spending Plan under the National Agreement.  If a member is covered by the BLET H&W Plan for 2009 he/she would be entitled to continue participation in the Flexible Spending Plan throughout the course of the year 2009 even if reduced to train service subsequent to being locked into the BLET H&W Plan for the 2009 calendar year.

I have also provided below the information on the BLET National Division site with links to description of benefits and enrollment forms.  Please encourage our membership to participate in this plan because our 2009 participation much reach 5% of our membership to retain the plan beyond 2009.  They can elect to participate in as small an amount as $120 for the year ($10 per month deduction).  The deadline for enrollment is approaching and it is imperative that those who want to participate enroll by November 12, 2008.  This is a very good benefit that we do not want to lose.

Thanking you in advance for your efforts, I remain.
Fraternally,
Gil Gore

Railroad Employees Flexible Benefits Program

In much the same way that a 401k program allows individuals to use pre-tax dollars to save for retirement, the Railroad Employees Flexible Benefits Program allows members to use pre-tax dollars to pay for certain medical expenses or dependent care expenses. The current 2008 plan allows members to save anywhere from $120 to $5,000 per year for dependent care expenses, or $120 to $3,600 per year for medical expenses. It is expected the dollar amounts will change under the upcoming 2009 plan year.

However, the program is in danger of being lost unless membership participation increases. Side Letter #8 of the 2007 National Contract specifies that at least 5 percent of eligible BLET members must participate in the plan or it will be terminated as of December 31, 2009. Current participation levels are below the 5 percent threshold, and the BLET is encouraging all members to contact United HealthCare for details when open enrollment begins.

Open enrollment for the plan will begin in the near future. Details on how to enroll will be provided on the BLET website and in the BLET newsletter once open enrollment begins.

In the meantime, the following information is being made available to BLET members so they can learn more about this money-saving plan.

2009 Enrollment Materials

Overview of Railroad Employees National Flexible Benefits Program for 2009 (PDF)

List of eligible carriers and Railroad Codes
(you will need these codes to complete your
enrollment forms) (PDF)

2009 Enrollment Form, Railroad Employees Flexible Benefits Program (PDF)

2009 Claim Form (PDF)

Over-the-Counter Medical Care Items Eligible and Ineligible for Reimbursement Under UnitedHealthcare Plans (PDF)

September 16, 2008
Flexible Spending Account will provide real savings

July 24, 2008
Flexible Benefit Plan information center now available

July 17, 2008
Flexible Spending Account enrollment begins in October

May 30, 2008
Flexible Benefits program allows members to save on health care expenses

 

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Court of Appeals stays direct observation rule

To All BLET Local Chairmen UP Southern Region

CLEVELAND, October 31 — In an order issued earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has temporarily stayed implementation of a Department of Transportation regulation that would have required direct observation of urine specimen donation in all return-to-duty and follow-up drug tests, which was to take effect tomorrow.

The stay will remain in effect until the Court considers and rules on an emergency motion filed by nine unions — including the BLET and International Brotherhood of Teamsters — and the BNSF Railway to stay the regulation until it has ruled on challenges to the constitutionality and legality of mandatory direct observation and an associated “strip search” requirement.

Friday, October 31, 2008
bentley@ble.org

http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4722

© 1997-2008 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
http://www.ble.org

 

Health care cost sharing to increase slightly

To All Local Chairmen BLET UP Southern Region

CLEVELAND, October 31 — Rail worker cost-sharing contributions toward health and welfare coverage will increase slightly next year, but the increase will not be as much as originally anticipated.
The monthly contribution will increase from $166.25 per month to $170.96 per month beginning January 1, 2009. However, it was expected that the rate would increase to as much as $192 per month.

Health care for all rail labor unions is negotiated jointly through the Cooperating Railway Labor Organizations (CRLO). CRLO is a joint policy holder with the carriers of the Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan, and participates in annual rate-setting meetings on an equal footing with the carriers.

According to the CRLO, the favorable trend in the medical premium for 2009 is in large part due to the removal of almost 20,000 ineligible dependents from the Plan through the recent eligibility audit — a savings of about $30 million for 2009.

In addition, medical claims are predicted to increase at a far lower rate than the national average of all insurance plans due to the implementation of several significant plan improvements, such as Nurse Line, Custom Care Coordination, Disease management, Integrated Behavioral Health, and Wellness Programs (Healthy Weight and Smoking Cessation). All of these changes are designed to improve the health and medical treatment of participants, and thereby reduce the frequency and severity of illness.

The monthly premium rate for the medical portion of the Plan increased a very modest 2.1% to $1,061.46. The Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment premium decreased 10% to $12.30, while the Dental Plan rate increased by 23.3% to $55.98. The Vision Plan rate remained the same at $10.00.

Employee cost-sharing amounts were set by the 2007 National Agreements at 15% of the premium rates for the above four components of members’ insurance coverage (Medical, Life, Dental and Vision). The total amount of the four components for 2009 is $1,139.74, which is an increase of $31.40, or 2.8% over 2008. The 2009 cost-sharing amount is thus 15% of $1,139.74, or $170.96, an increase of $4.71 over the current amount of $166.25.

“Our cost-sharing increase was far lower than expected and well below the national average, which is a significant accomplishment,” said BLET National President Ed Rodzwicz. “The BLET will continue to work diligently along with the CRLO to keep employee cost sharing to a minimum while moving ahead with the constant improvement of our membership’s benefits.”

Friday, October 31, 2008
bentley@ble.org

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Flexible Spending Account Information

From: Warren Dent [mailto:jwdent1@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 8:16 AM
To: All Local Chairmen
Subject: Flexible Spending Account Information

Brothers,

You have all seen the messages from the GCA and ND offices about the upcoming annual enrollment for the Flexible Spending Account plan option. Those messages have emphasized the necessity of our increasing the number of active participants in order to protect and preserve this valuable option. We have to have a minimum 5% of the membership participating in the plan or it is lost after December 2009. Current enrollment is below the 5% threshold. I am of the opinion that the reason for this is that most of our membership is in the dark about what the plan is or how they can benefit from it. I must admit that, until recently, I counted myself in that group.

Depending on an individual’s medical circumstances and number of dependents, some Brothers/Sisters have more to gain than others, but the truth is that everyone can derive a benefit from this plan. The minimum contribution is $120 per year but you can earmark up to $3600 annually for medical expenses. The designated annual contribution amount is evenly deducted via payroll throughout the year. The monies contributed are not subject to Federal Income Tax. Therefore, a minimum $120 annual contribution from one in a 25%-33% tax bracket, would net the individual a $30-$40 tax savings on monies he/she was going to spend anyway. Deductibles and co-pays for Doctors, Dentists, Optometrists and Specialists qualify for reimbursement under the plan as do prescription medications and some common over the counter meds. For your info, I have attached some information about over the counter medications that qualify for reimbursement.
Click Here for UHC OTC info

Click Here for IRS OTC info

Click Here for more OTC info

In addition to the medical plan there is also another plan covering dependent care costs, with a maximum annual contribution limit of $5000. While this option might impact a smaller percentage of the membership, for those who qualify, it can be a vitally important benefit.

Understand that contributed monies that go unused over the 12 month period are lost, so I am encouraging those electing to avail themselves of this opportunity to be wise when determining their contribution amount. Even with that in mind, it is easy to see where virtually every member, even if enrolled for only the plan minimum of $120 per year, stands to gain from participation in this plan.

I understand that United Healthcare will be mailing the FSA registration packet to each member sometime next week and we will have about 30 days to respond. I urge each of you to consider whether the plan is right for you. Even if you chose not to participate, I’m asking each of you to spread the word to your membership about the plan and its’ benefits so that they understand what it is about and have an opportunity to make an educated decision concerning their participation. I would hate to see us lose this valuable opportunity and agreement right due to a participation shortfall that was based on lack of knowledge and/or understanding. I just ask that you give it some thought and encourage all those Brothers/Sisters that you influence, or come in contact with, to do the same.

You can view informational articles about the Flexible Spending Account plan on the ND website at www.ble-t.org. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me and I will do my best to get them answered.

Fraternally yours,

Warren Dent

Friday, October 03, 2008

FRA clamps down on use of electronic devices

CLEVELAND, October 3 — In the aftermath of the most deadly passenger rail accident in more than a decade, and just days after the National Transportation Safety Board reported that the engineer of one of the trains involved in the September 12 tragedy had sent and received dozens of text messages while on duty, the Federal Railroad Administration ("FRA") is issuing an Emergency Order that severely restricts the use of cell phones and other wireless communication and personal electronic devices by operating crews.

Emergency Order No. 26, which is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, October 7, goes into effect on Monday, October 27, which is 20 days after publication. The Emergency Order governs operating employees’ use of mobile telephones (commonly called cell telephones or cell phones), other electronic devices or electrical devices, and other portable electronic devices (such as portable digital video disc (DVD) players, radio receivers, and audio players) capable of distracting a railroad operating employee from a safety-critical duty. It does not restrict use of the railroad radio or working wireless communications already subject to 49 CFR Part 220.

The uses of electronic devices that are restricted by the Emergency Order include:

·  the use of a mobile telephone or another electronic or electrical device to conduct an oral communication;

·  placing or receiving a telephone call;

·  sending or reading an electronic mail message or text message;

·  playing a game;

·  navigating the Internet;

·  playing, viewing, or listening to a video;

·  playing, viewing, or listening to a television broadcast;

·  playing or listening to a radio broadcast other than a radio broadcast by a railroad;

·  playing or listening to music;

·  executing a computational function; and

·  performing any other function that is not necessary for the health or safety of the person and that entails the risk of distracting the employee from a safety-critical task.

All personal electronic devices — electronic devices not supplied by the railroad — must be turned off and any electronic earpieces must be removed while a train is moving; the only exception is that, when radio failure occurs, wireless communication devices may be used in accordance with railroad rules and instructions. Personal electronic devices also must be turned off with electronic earpieces removed when duties (1) require an operating employee to ride rolling equipment during switching operations, or (2) require any railroad employees to be on the ground, including any situation where other employees of the railroad are assisting in preparation of the train (e.g., during an air brake test). Operating employees may not use personal electronic devices for any purpose other than voice communications.

The use of a railroad-supplied electronic device by a locomotive engineer (including a remote-control locomotive operator) is prohibited while the train is moving or when duties (1) require an operating employee to ride rolling equipment during switching operations, or (2) require any railroad employees to be on the ground, including any situation where other employees of the railroad are assisting in preparation of the train. An operating employee other than a locomotive engineer may use a railroad-supplied mobile telephone or remote computing device in the cab of a locomotive for an authorized business purpose, after a safety briefing, provided that all assigned personnel on the crew agree that it is safe to do so.

A railroad operating employee may use a railroad-supplied electronic or electrical device for an approved business purpose while on duty within the body of a passenger train or railroad business car. However, use of the device shall not excuse the individual using the device from the responsibility to call or acknowledge any signal, inspect any passing train, or perform any other safety-sensitive duty assigned under the railroad''''''''s operating rules and special instructions.

For freight train crewmembers, a railroad operating employee may not use a railroad-supplied electronic or electrical device for an approved business purpose while on duty outside the cab unless the following conditions are met: (1) the employee is not fouling a track; (2) no switching operation is underway; (3) no other safety duties are presently required; and (4) all members of the crew have been briefed that operations are suspended.

The Emergency Order does not restrict an operating employee from using the digital storage and display function of a railroad-supplied electronic device to refer to a railroad rule, special instruction, timetable or other directive. In addition, operating employees may use wireless communication devices as necessary to respond to an emergency situation involving the operation of the railroad or encountered while performing duties for the railroad.

In addition to being subject to discipline or dismissal for violating a railroad operating rule governing the use of electronic devices, willful violation of the Emergency Order could subject the violator to a substantial civil penalty. FRA also could move to disqualify a violator from performing safety-sensitive service temporarily or permanently.

BLET National President Ed Rodzwicz endorsed the Emergency Order on behalf of BLET members. "We applaud the NTSB for bringing this information forward promptly, and the FRA for acting quickly," Rodzwicz said. "Sadly, the use of electronic devices has literally become a life and death issue for all operating employees and compliance with the Emergency Order must be absolute," added Rodzwicz.

Click here to view or download FRA Emergency Order 26 in PDF format (30 pages):
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/FRAEmergencyOrder26.pdf

 

Monday, September 29, 2008

Teamsters offer Hurricane Ike Disaster Relief assistance in Louisiana, Texas

CLEVELAND, September 24 — The Teamsters Disaster Relief Fund is accepting applications for assistance from members in Louisiana and Texas after Hurricane Ike damaged homes and property in early September.
Assistance is available to individuals and households in the following Louisiana counties who may have experienced a loss due to this disaster:
Acadian, Beauregard, Calcasieu, Cameron, Iberia, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Lafourche, Plaquemines, Sabine, St. Mary, Terrebonne, Vermilion, and Vernon Parishes.
To help increase awareness of this valuable assistance, members who live and work in Louisiana are asked to print and post the following notice at their places of work:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/LAikedisasterflyer.pdf
Assistance is also available to individuals and houses in the following Texas counties:
Angelina, Austin, Brazoria, Chambers, Cherokee, Fort Bend, Galveston, Grimes, Hardin, Harris, Houston, Jasper, Jefferson, Liberty, Madison, Matagorda, Montgomery, Nacogdoches, Newton, Orange, Polk, Sabine, San Augustine, San Jacinto, Trinity, Tyler, Walker, Waller, and Washington Counties.
To help increase awareness of this valuable assistance, members who live and work in Texas are asked to print and post the following notice at their places of work:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/TXikedisasterflyer.pdf
If you or someone you know needs help, please call the Teamsters Disaster Relief Fund office at: (202) 624-8971. If you were impacted by the hurricane, please download and complete the "Request for Help" form available below. The completed "Request for Help" forms (including all requested documentation) must be returned to the Teamsters by Tuesday, October 28, 2008.
Members living in Louisiana who wish to apply for relief should print and complete the following “Request for Help” form:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/LAikedisasterrelief.pdf
Members living in Texas who wish to apply for relief should print and complete the following “Request for Help” form:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/TXikedisasterrelief.pdf
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
bentley@ble.org
http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4697
1997-2008 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
http://www.ble.org

 

Sunday, September 21, 2008

FW: Joe Biden in Ohio this week: "John McCain and the Bush Administration have declared a war on organized labor's house"


From: Tolman, John [mailto:tolman@ble-t.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 9:56 AM
To: _NDOfficers; _Legislative Chairmen US GCA; _General Chairmen US GCA; _SpecialReps; _GIA; _ExecStaff
Subject: Spam:***, FW: Joe Biden in Ohio this week: "John McCain and the Bush Administration have declared a war on organized labor's house"

 

Brothers and Sisters

Now you know why he selected Senator Biden, our friend.

Frats

John

John P. Tolman

Vice President and National Legislative Representative

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/obamaroadblog/gGg4pG

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Flexible Spending Account will provide real savings

CLEVELAND, September 16 — Registration for the money-saving Flexible Spending Account (FSA) begins next month, and BLET members are encouraged to take advantage of this valuable new health and welfare benefit. The program allows BLET members to pay for doctor co-pays and other medical expenses with pretax dollars.
A partial list of items that qualify for this type of payment includes: Doctor co-pays; Drug Co-pays; Dental Co-pays or other dental expenses not covered in our dental plan; Vision Co-pays or additional cost for eye care not covered under the national plan; and Over the counter medications, such as cold medicine, decongestant medicine, aspirin, Tylenol or their generic brands.
At the Union Pacific Railroad, Southern Region General Chairman Gil Gore is a staunch supporter of the program. He encourages all BLET members to sign up.
“I have a personal experience with the medical portion of the FSA,” Brother Gore said. “The program has helped tremendously with braces and other major dental work for my children not covered by our health insurance.”
Brother Gore gave braces and orthodontist work as an example. He said the FSA could really help BLET members who have children save money.
“If you have some major dental work scheduled (such as braces for your kids) up to $3,600 of that expense can be paid with pretax dollars,” he said. “If you are in a 25%–33 % tax bracket, that amounts to as much as a $1,200 reduction in the federal taxes that you pay.
“We planned ahead to have our children’s dental work done at the proper time to get maximum benefit from the plan,” he said.
In much the same way that a 401k program allows individuals to use pre-tax dollars to save for retirement, the Railroad Employees Flexible Benefits Program allows members to use pre-tax dollars to pay for certain medical expenses or dependent care expenses. The current 2008 plan allows members to save anywhere from $120 to $5,000 per year for dependent care expenses, or $120 to $3,600 per year for medical expenses. It is expected the dollar amounts will change under the upcoming 2009 plan year.
Just like 401k contributions are automatically deducted from your paycheck, membership contributions to the Flexible Spending Account are withheld from your paycheck. Your contributions to the plan are spread out over 12 monthly payments (in other words, if you elect the 2008 maximum of $3,600, then you would place $300 per month into your Flexible Spending Account). If you elected the 2008 minimum of $120, then you would have $10 per month deducted from your pay and placed into your Flexible Spending Account. You can receive payment from the account when you present a bill via a claim form. You must furnish receipts to be reimbursed for the expense.
“It also allows you to pay for all of your co-payments on doctor visits and for prescription medicine,” Brother Gore said.
Additionally, some over the counter medications can be paid for using the Flexible Spending Account. United HealthCare has provided a list of medications that it will reimburse under the Flexible Spending Account:
http://www.ble-t.org/pr/pdf/OTCMedFSA.pdf
The plan also has a “use it or lose it” provision. For example, if you sign up for $2,000 in flex spending deductions and only have expenses equal to $1,900, then you would only be able to collect $1,900 of the $2,000 you put into your account. But if you were in a 33% tax bracket, that would still net you $533 in savings for the year ($633 tax savings minus the $100 left in the account = $533 net savings).
“While I know the ‘use it or lose it’ function of the plan can be scary, you can easily meet the minimum deduction of $120 for the year just on over the counter medications, which would yield you a net savings of $40 for the year if you were in a 33% tax bracket,” Brother Gore said. “My wife and I have put the maximum in her flex spending account for the last eight years and been able to provide receipts to receive a total refund every year.
“Our over the counter medicine for our family in the year 2006 came to $217. If you are on maintenance medications this program can put real dollars into your pocket allowing you to pay your co-pays with pretax dollars.”
Side Letter 8 of the 2007 BLET National Agreement stipulates that the BLET must reach at least 5% participation by the year 2009 in order to retain this benefit. This is a big reason why the BLET is strongly encouraging its members to participate in the Flexible Spending Account program.
“This is a benefit that will put real dollars into your pockets and I encourage you all to enroll at an amount you are comfortable with to see how the plan works,” Gore said.
Enrollment opportunity for the Flexible Spending Account (FSA) should arrive in your mailbox soon from United HealthCare.
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
bentley@ble.org

http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4693
1997-2008 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
http://www.ble.org

 

 

Friday, September 12, 2008

Conference Call Following Hurricane IKE 3pm Daily Until Further Notice

Brothers and Sisters

We are going to conduct a daily 3pm conference call beginning on September 12, 2008 to discuss the status of the railroad and assess the damage to our membership.  Please contact your Local Chairman to secure the conference call dial in information so that you can participate in this resource provided by your General Committee.

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

Friday, August 29, 2008

2 Dead, 1 Hurt In Train Crash Near Medford

Brothers,

It is with a heavy heart that I bring news to you that one of our Engineers BLET Div 523 member Richard Pendarvis and UTU Conductor Larry Williams were killed in a crossing accident when their train colided with a propane truck.  Brother Pendarvis was 52 years old and orignally hired on with Union Pacific in 1999.  Brother Williams was 53 and hired on with Union Pacific in 2002.
Please keep the Pendarvis and Williams famlies in your thoughts and prayers.
Below is a link to some news coverage of the incident.
Fraternally,
Gil Gore

.
http://www.koco.com/news/17334888/detail.html

Limo Reporting Hotline Available Online

Brothers,

 

Thanks to Brother Scott Alexander’s assistance we now have a Limo Reporting Hotline where crews can enter information to correct limo issues.  The site is accessible from the claim webpage main page for each member.  If you as a local chairman need to file a report for a member, simply do a “Find a Member” search and select the AC / Limo Reporting link to file a record for that member.

 

It is imperative that everyone provide the requested detail information so that we can properly identify the who, what, when and where of the situation.  f our members will use this feature, it offers the opportunity to track limo delays along with excessive hours on duty by capturing that information into our online database. 

 

The site can be accessed by going to the New Claims Link on our website (www.bleupsrgca.com) or by going directly to the claims page at http://claims.upengineer.org/index.php and logging into the system to fill out the report.

 

I will put out a broad case message in the system to notify all members of the new feature when they log into the system and acknowledge the message.

If you are logging in to the WebClaims system for the first time, the default password is the last four digits of your EID #. It is highly recommended to change the password once you have successfully logged in to the system. You may do this by the "Edit Your Profile" link from the Main Menu.

Kudos to Brother Scott Alexander for his extra effort to set this system up so quickly.

 

Hoping you find this information useful, I remain.

Fraternally,

Gil Gore. 

 

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

DRUG TESTING FINAL RULE POSTPONED UNTIL NOVEMBER 1, 2008 - COMMENTS DUE BY SEPTEMBER 25, 2008

Brothers,

 

The attached was published in today’s Federal Register. In response to petitions from certain transportation industry and labor groups, the Department of Transportation is changing the effective date of 49 CFR 40.67(b) direct observation of follow up drug tests from August 25, 2008, to November 1, 2008.

 

To see an online version of this document Click HERE.

 

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

 

SUMMARY: In response to petitions from certain transportation industry and labor groups, the Department of Transportation is changing the effective date of 49 CFR 40.67(b) from August 25, 2008, to November 1, 2008. The Department is also requesting comments concerning the content of § 40.67(b) for 30 days. This section of the Department’s drug testing procedural rule requires employers to ensure that all follow-up and return-to-duty drug tests are directly observed.

DATES: The effective date of the revision of 49 CFR 40.67(b) published June 25, 2008 (73 FR 35970) is delayed from August 25, 2008, to November 1, 2008. Comments should be submitted by September 25, 2008.

See document for ways to deliver comments on this issue the DOT.

 

Monday, August 25, 2008

DOT delays mandatory direct observation regulation to November 1

http://www.ble.org/pr/news/newsflash.asp?id=4682

 

 

CLEVELAND, August 24 — The U.S. Department of Transportation is postponing

from August 25 to November 1 a new regulation that would subject employees

to mandatory direct observation during drug tests conducted when a

transportation worker returns to work after a positive drug test and

during follow-up drug tests.

 

The current DOT regulation, which will remain in effect for the time

being, requires direct observation of urine collection only after an

invalid test, and is discretionary during return-to-duty and follow-up

tests.

 

DOT has not delayed implementation of a related requirement that would

subject workers to a "strip search" in those situations when a direct

observation will be made. Section 40.67(i) states as follows:

 

"As the observer, you must request the employee to raise his or her shirt,

blouse, or dress/skirt, as appropriate, above the waist; and lower

clothing and underpants to show you, by turning around, that they do not

have a prosthetic device. After you have determined that the employee does

not have such a device, you may permit the employee to return clothing to

its proper position for observed urination."

 

It is expected that the postponement will be published in the August 25

Federal Register. Also, the DOT will open a 30-day public comment period,

during which time interested parties may comment on whether direct

observation should be mandatory in all return-to-duty and follow-up tests.

 

In mid-August, the BLET along with seven other rail unions and the BNSF

Railway, filed a lawsuit challenging both aspects of the new regulation on

the grounds that they violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution, which protects citizens from unreasonable searches. The

joint petition for review was filed in the United States Court of Appeals

for the District of Columbia Circuit.

 

 

---

This message was sent by the BLET NewsFlash Service.

To unsubscribe, go to http://www.ble-t.org

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Response to Second Class of Service Potision - Aggregate Rock Pools

From: Gore, Gil [mailto:gilgore1@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 5:54 PM To: All Local Chairmen Subject: Response to Second Class of Service Potision - Aggregate Rock Pools

Brothers,

Attached for your information is a copy of letters sent to the undersigned and UTU GC Johnson by the carrier taking an erroneous position regarding the payment of penalty claims for aggregate pools handling non-aggregate cars. Brother Johnson and I agreed to a joint letter opposing this position which is attached for your ready reference.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

To view the Joint Letter click HERE

To view the Carrier letter to BLET click HERE

To view the Carrier Letter to UTU click HERE

Monday, August 18, 2008

FRA Updates Quite Zones

Brothers,

FRA has updated their list of quite zones at the following link http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/THRReport81408.pdf

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

FW: Petition for Waiver of compliance

Brothers,

 

Attached is a copy of the waivers from the AAR and ASLRRA filed jointly seeking a delay in the August 25, 2008 implementation date of amendments to Title 49 CFR § 40.67 which was issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT) on June 25, 2008 (73 FR 35961). Part 40 is incorporated by reference in § 219.701 of Title 49, CFR, Part 219, Control of Drug and Alcohol Use in Railroad Operations.  As you are aware by my previous message of 08-08-08, this provision involved “direct observation” of drug tests in certain conditions.  Please share this information with our members.  It is also posted to our e-mail blogg at http://bletsre-mail.blogspot.com/.  

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

Click HERE to view waiver from AAR and ASLRRA.

Click HERE to view Q&As from UP on direct observation testing.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Unions challenge DOT’s “strip search” regulation

CLEVELAND, August 14 — The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, along with seven other rail unions and the BNSF Railway, has filed a lawsuit challenging a new Department of Transportation (DOT) regulation that would subject employees to a "strip search" during mandatory drug tests. The DOT regulation, which would become effective August 25, requires railroads to directly observe urine collection in all federally-mandated drug tests involving either a return-to-duty after a positive or invalid test, or a follow-up test conducted after a positive or invalid test. Prior to directly observing the specimen donation, the collector also would be required to subject the worker to a "strip search," because the new regulation states as follows: "As the observer, you must request the employee to raise his or her shirt, blouse, or dress/skirt, as appropriate, above the waist; and lower clothing and underpants to show you, by turning around, that they do not have a prosthetic device. After you have determined that the employee does not have such a device, you may permit the employee to return clothing to its proper position for observed urination." The DOT’s "strip search" regulation is being challenged, in part, on the basis that the mandatory strip searches and observations violate the prohibition against unreasonable searches contained in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In addition, review is being sought to determine whether DOT complied with the rule making process of the Administrative Procedures Act. BLET National President Ed Rodzwicz blasted the new regulation. "Forcing a railroad worker to submit to an embarrassing and humiliating strip search and observed collection without reasonable suspicion is an outrage," he said. Other unions participating in the lawsuit include: the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division; American Train Dispatchers Association; Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen; Transportation Communications International Union; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; National Conference of Firemen and Oilers; and United Transportation Union. In a statement, the BNSF Railway Executive Vice President Carl Ice said: "There is absolutely no tolerance for alcohol or drug use in our workplace. But we also believe that our employees are entitled to be treated with dignity and respect at the workplace, and this new regulation is an intrusion on employees." President Rodzwicz said that if this regulation had been in effect since FRA began keeping these statistics, almost 21,000 unnecessary strip searches and direct observations would have been required, "needlessly humiliating over 99.97 percent of all those required to submit to return-to-duty or follow-up testing." President Rodzwicz also said there is no reason to justify the DOT’s overly harsh and humiliating regulation. "There is no documentation whatsoever of adulteration or substitution of a return-to-duty test in the railroad industry, and not one of the nearly 11,000 return-to-duty and follow-up tests conducted in 2006 and 2007 were invalidated because of adulteration or substitution," President Rodzwicz said. The joint petition for review was filed on August 13 in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Court of Appeals is expected to issue a schedule for conducting its review shortly.

RRB final rule

From: Gore, Gil [mailto:gilgore1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:45 AM
To: ALL LOCAL CHAIRMEN BLET SR GCA

Subject: FW: RRB final rule

Brothers,

Attached and below is reference to the final rule regarding payments from the RR Retirement System pursuant to Court Decree or Court-Approved Property Settlement.  The law has been changed to continue Tier II benefits to former spouses even after the death of an employee effective August 17, 2007.  If the employee passed away prior to that date, then this provision would not be applicable per my understanding of the change.

I would suggest that we get this information to all members who have the misfortune to have recently gone through or are going through a divorce with instructions that they provide the same to their legal representation in the matter.

To view the document in PDF click HERE

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

From: Policy, Kathleen [mailto:policy@ble-t.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 8:54 AM
To: _General Chairmen US GCA; _Legislative Chairmen US GCA
Cc: Tolman, John; Pontolillo, Tom
Subject: RRB final rule

Attached is the Railroad Retirement Board’s final rule regarding Payments Pursuant to Court Decree or Court-Approved Property Settlement, published in today’s Federal Register.

Kathleen Policy

Legislative, Political & Regulatory Coordinator

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

Teamsters Rail Conference

25 Louisiana Ave. NW

Washington, D.C. 20001

Office: (202) 624-8766

Cell: (202) 552-9328

Fax: (202) 624-3086

policy@ble-t.org

www.bletdc.org

 

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

FW: Rooms for 2008 SWCM

Brothers,

 

For your info, please see Brother Grimes’ message below about the SWMA coming up in St. Louis MO.

 

Gil

 

From: D Grimes [mailto:dgrimes@boycomonline.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Gil Gore; Jim Dayton; Bill Hannah; Bruce McArthur; Michael Young
Subject: Rooms for 2008 SWCM

 

Brothers:  Please forward the following message to your members;

 

Thanks,

 

Dave Grimes

 

Brothers:

 

As we have sold out our block at the Hilton for the 2008 SWCM in St. Louis we have secured a block of rooms at The Millennium Hotel.  This hotel is very nice and is only a block and a half from the Hilton and within easy walking distance.   We have a contract rate of $135.00 per night.  You can contact the hotel by phone at 1-866-866-8086 or 314-241-9500 and ask for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers rate.  You can also make your reservations by following the link below.

 

http://reservations.synxis.com/LBE/rez.aspx?Hotel=11544&Chain=5303&lang=1&group=BLE&arrive=9/14/2008&depart=9/18/2008

 

Above is the link to access the reservation booking engine for our group. If you would like to get more information on the hotel, you can go through the website at www.millenniumhotels.com/stlouis.

 

Dave Grimes

573-776-8333

 

 

FW: RJ Santorelli, LR-1487514-D / su 16

-----Original Message-----
From: Gore, Gil [mailto:gilgore1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:13 AM
To: All Locla Chairmen

Subject: FW: RJ Santorelli, LR-1487514-D / su 16

 

Brothers,

 

For your information, above is a discipline case that was apparently settled on Brother Hannah's Committee on property without arbitration.  The Carrier agreed to the reinstatement with pay but have now reneged on that commitment trying to offset lost earnings against monies that were made or should have been made during the suspension period.  It is also my understanding that a similar case is ongoing in Las Vegas off of Brother Dayton's GCA as well.

 

It is my suggestion that any settlements of outstanding discipline be run by this Office prior to signing any return to work documents.  We will work with legal counsel on developing some iron clad language to avoid this in

the future.

 

Click Here to view document HERE

 

Fraternally,

Gil Gore

 

 

BLET - CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION

This message is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and is legally privileged.  The content of this message is for informational purposes only; provided to the membership of the BLET and should not be construed as any official position on the application of any contract language discussed in this communication and should not be used or referenced by anyone in future proceedings.  Any use of this information by anyone other than intended recipients is prohibited.

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Bill Hannah [mailto:dwh@bletupwl.org]

Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:02 PM

To: 'Bruce MacArthur'; 'Chairlie Reightnowar'; 'Gil Gore'; 'Mike Young'; 'Tim Donnigan'

Cc: 'Lee Pruitt'

Subject: FW: RJ Santorelli, LR-1487514-D / su 16

 

Well - not that we didn't know the fight was coming, but this is the first

one I seen so far on the UP.

 

Bill

 

-----Original Message-----

From: BENATESCH@UP.COM [mailto:BENATESCH@UP.COM]

Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:52 AM

To: Kristeen Clough; Bill Hannah

Subject: RJ Santorelli, LR-1487514-D / su 16

 

 

Deduction of outside wages request.

 

(See attached file: Santorelli,RJ_Outside

Earnings_LR-1487514-D_Hannah,DW.doc).

This message and any attachments contain information from Union Pacific

which may be confidential and/or privileged.

If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,

copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly

prohibited by law. If you receive this message in error, please contact the

sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments.